Changes Introduced in CVL 2
CVL 2 is a major overhaul to the type system of CVL. Though many of the changes are internal, we wanted to take this opportunity to introduce a few improvements to the syntax. The general goal of these changes is to make the behavior of CVL more explicit and predictable, and to bring the syntax more in line with Solidity’s syntax.
This document summarizes the changes to CVL syntax introduced by CVL 2.
The CVLMigration
repository contains examples demonstrating each of the
changes; the cvl1
branch contains the examples in valid CVL 1 syntax, while
the cvl2
branch contains the same examples in CVL 2 syntax. You can see the
differences here, our you can clone the
repository and compare the cvl1
and cvl2
branches using
your favorite tools.
Superficial syntax changes
There are several simple changes to the syntax to make specs more uniform and consistent, and to reduce the superficial differences with Solidity.
function
and ;
required for methods block entries
In CVL 2, methods block entries must now start with function
and end with
;
(semicolons were optional in CVL 1). For example
(CVL 1, CVL 2, diff):
transferFrom(address, address, uint) returns(bool) envfree
will become
function transferFrom(address, address, uint) external returns(bool) envfree;
(note also the addition of external
, described below).
This is also true for entries with summaries:
balanceOf(address) returns(uint256) => ALWAYS(3)
will become
function balanceOf(address) external returns(uint256) => ALWAYS(3);
If you do not change this, you will get an error message like the following:
CRITICAL: [main] ERROR ALWAYS - certora/spec/MethodsEntries.spec:4:5: Syntax error: unexpected token near ID(transferFrom)
CRITICAL: [main] ERROR ALWAYS - certora/spec/MethodsEntries.spec:4:5: Couldn't repair and continue parse unexpected token near ID(transferFrom)
Required ;
in more places
using
, import
, use
, and invariant
statements all require a ;
at the
end. For example
(CVL 1, CVL 2, diff):
invariant balanceOfZeroIsZero()
balanceOf(0) == 0
becomes
invariant balanceOfZeroIsZero()
balanceOf(0) == 0;
use
and invariant
statements do not require (and may not have) a semicolon
if they are followed by a preserved
or filtered
block. For example, the
following is valid in both CVL 1 and CVL 2:
invariant totalSupplyBoundsBalance(address a)
balanceOf(a) <= totalSupply()
{ preserved { require false; } }
If you do not change this, you will see an error like the following:
CRITICAL: [main] ERROR ALWAYS - certora/spec/Semicolons.spec:5:1: Syntax error: unexpected token near using
CRITICAL: [main] ERROR ALWAYS - certora/spec/Semicolons.spec:5:1: Couldn't repair and continue parse unexpected token near using
Method literals require sig:
In some places in CVL, you can refer to a contract method by its name and argument types. For example, you might write (CVL 1, CVL 2, diff):
f.selector == approve(address, uint).selector
In this example, approve(address,uint)
is a method literal. In CVL 2,
these methods literals must now start with sig:
. For example, the above
would become:
f.selector == sig:approve(address, uint).selector
If you do not change this, you will see the following error:
Error: Error in spec file (MethodLiterals.spec:14:5): Variable address is undefined (first instance only reported)
Error: Error in spec file (MethodLiterals.spec:14:5): Variable uint is undefined (first instance only reported)
Error: Error in spec file (MethodLiterals.spec:15:34): could not type expression "address", message: unknown variable "address"
Error: Error in spec file (MethodLiterals.spec:15:43): could not type expression "uint", message: unknown variable "uint"
Use of contract name instead of using
variable
In CVL 1, the only way to refer to a contract in the scene was to first
introduce a contract instance variable with a using
statement, and then use
that variable. For example, to access a struct type S
defined in
PrimaryContract.sol
, you would need to write
(CVL 1, CVL 2, diff):
using PrimaryContract as primary;
rule structExample {
primary.S x;
...
}
In CVL 2, you must now use the name of the contract, rather than the instance variable, when referring to user-defined types. The above example would now be written
rule structExample {
PrimaryContract.S x;
...
}
There is no need for a using
statement in this example.
If you don’t change this, you will an error like the following:
Error: Error in spec file (ContractNames.spec:12:19): Contract name primary does not exist in the scene. Make sure you are using a contract name and not a contract instance name.
Calling methods on secondary contracts still requires using a contract instance variable:
using SecondaryContract as secondary;
rule multicontractExample {
...
secondary.balanceOf(0);
...
}
Entries in the methods
block may use either the contract name or an instance
variable:
using SecondaryContract as secondary;
methods {
//// both are valid (and the effect is the same):
secondary.balanceOf(address) returns(uint) envfree
SecondaryContract.transfer(address, uint) returns(bool) envfree
}
Using the contract name in the methods block currently has the same effect as using an instance variable; this may change in future versions of CVL.
Rules must start with rule
In CVL 1, you could omit the keyword rule
when writing rules
(CVL 1, CVL 2, diff):
transferReverts {
...
}
In CVL 2, the rule
keyword is no longer optional:
rule transferReverts {
...
}
If you don’t change this, you will receive an error like the following:
CRITICAL: [main] ERROR ALWAYS - certora/spec/RuleKeyword.spec:3:1: Syntax error: unexpected token near ID(transferReverts)
Changes to methods block entries
In addition to the superficial changes listed above, there are some changes to
the way that methods block entries can be written (there are also a
few instances where the meanings of entries has
changed). In CVL 1, methods
block entries often had several different
functions and meanings:
They were used to indicate targets for summarization
They were used to write generic specs that could apply to contracts with missing methods
They were used to declare targets
envfree
The changes described in this section make these different uses more explicit:
Most Solidity types allowed as arguments
CVL 1 had some restrictions on the types of arguments allowed in methods
block
entries. For example, user-defined types (such as enums and structs) were not
fully supported.
CVL 2 methods
block entries may use any Solidity types for arguments and
return values, except for function types and contract or
interface types.
To work around the missing types, CVL 1 allowed users to encode some
user-defined types as primitive types in the methods
block; these workarounds
are no longer allowed in CVL 2. For example, consider the following solidity
function:
contract Example {
enum Permission { READ, WRITE };
function f(Permission p) internal { ... }
}
In CVL 1, a methods block entry for f
would need to declare that it takes a
uint8
argument:
methods {
f(uint8 permission) => NONDET
}
In CVL 2, the methods block entry should use the same type as the Solidity implementations[^contract-types] (compare files), except for function types and contract or interface types:
methods {
function f(Example.Permission p) internal => NONDET;
}
The method can be called from CVL as follows:
rule example {
f(Example.Permission.READ);
}
Contract functions that take or return contract or interface types should
instead use address
in the methods
block declaration. For example, if the
contract contains the following function:
function listToken(IERC20 token) internal { ... }
the methods
block should use address
for the token
argument:
methods {
function listToken(address token) internal;
}
Contract functions that take or return function types are not currently supported.
Required internal
or external
annotation
Every methods block entry must be marked either internal
or external
. The
annotation must come after the argument list and before the returns
clause.
If a function is declared public
in Solidity, then the Solidity compiler
creates an internal implementation method, and an external wrapper method that
calls the internal implementation. Therefore, you can summarize a public
method by marking the summarization internal
.
Warning
The behavior of internal
vs. external
summarization for public methods can
be confusing, especially because functions called directly from CVL are not
summarized. See Visibility modifiers.
optional
methods block entries
In CVL 1, you could write an entry in the methods block for a method that does not exist in the contract; rules that would call the non-existent method were skipped during verification.
This behavior can lead to confusion, because typos or name changes could silently cause a rule to be skipped.
In CVL 2, this behavior is still available, but the methods entry must contain
the keyword optional
somewhere after the returns
clause and before the
summarization (if any).
Required calldata
, memory
, or storage
annotations for reference types
In CVL 2, methods block entries for internal functions must contain either calldata
,
memory
, or storage
annotations for all arguments with reference types (such
as arrays).
For methods block entries of external functions the location annotation must be
omitted unless it’s the storage
annotation on an external library function, in
which case it is required (the reasoning here is to have the information required
in order to correctly calculate a function’s sighash).
Summaries only apply to one contract by default
In CVL 1, a summary in the methods
block applied to all methods with the
given signature.
In CVL 2, summaries only apply to a single contract, unless the old behavior is
explicitly requested by using _
as the receiver. If no contract is specified,
the default is currentContract
.
Note
The receiver contract must be the contract where the method is defined. If a contract inherits a method defined in a supercontract, the receiver must be the supercontract, rather than the inheriting contract.
Entries that use _
as the receiver are called wildcard entries, summaries
that do not are called exact entries.
Consider the following example:
using C as c;
methods {
function f(uint) internal => NONDET;
function c.g(uint) internal => ALWAYS(4);
function h(uint) internal => ALWAYS(1);
function _.h(uint) internal => NONDET;
}
In this example, the internal function currentContract.f
has a NONDET
summary, c.g
has an ALWAYS
summary, a call to currentContact.h
has an
ALWAYS
summary and a call to h(uint)
on any other contract will use a
NONDET
summary.
Summaries for specific contract methods (including the default
currentContract
) always override wildcard summaries.
Wildcard entries cannot be declared optional
or envfree
, since these
annotations only make sense for specific contract methods.
Warning
The meaning of your summarizations will change from CVL 1 to CVL 2. In CVL 2,
any entry without an _
will only apply to a single contract!
Requirements on returns
In CVL 1, the returns
clause on methods block entries was optional.
CVL 2 has stricter requirements on the declared return types.
Entries that apply to specific contracts (i.e. those that don’t use the
_.f
syntax) must include a returns
clause if the
contract method returns a value. A specific-contract entry may only omit the
returns
clause if the contract method does not return a value.
The Prover will report an error if the contract method’s return type differs
from the type declared in the methods
block entry.
Wildcard entries must not declare return types, because they may apply to
multiple methods that return different types. If a wildcard entry is summarized
with a ghost or function summary, the summary must include an expect
clause;
see Expression summaries for more details.
Changes to integer types
In CVL 1, the rules for casting between integer types were complex; CVL 2 simplifies them.
The general rule of thumb is that you should use mathint
whenever possible;
only use uint
or int
types for data that will be passed as input to
contract functions.
It is now impossible for CVL math expressions to cause overflow - all integer operations are exact. The remainder of this section describes the changes in detail.
Mathematical operations return mathint
In CVL 2, the results of all arithmetic operators have type mathint
,
regardless of the input types. Arithmetic operators include +
,
*
, -
, /
, ^
, and %
, but not bitwise operators like <<
, xor
, and |
(changes to bitwise operators are described below).
The primary impact of this change is that you may need to declare more of your
variables as mathint
instead of uint
. If you are passing the results of
arithmetic operations to contract functions, you will need to be more explicit
about the overflow behavior by using the new casting operators.
Implicit and explicit casting
If every number that can be represented by one type can also be represented by another type, then we say that the first type is a subtype of the second type.
For example, a uint8
variable could have any value between 0
and 2^8-1
,
and all of these values can be stored in a uint16
variable, so uint8
is a
subtype of uint16
. An int16
can also store any value between 0
and
2^8-1
, so uint8
is also a subtype of int16
.
All integer types are subtypes of mathint
, since any integer can be
represented by a mathint
.
In CVL 1, the rules for converting between supertypes and subtypes were complicated; they depended not only on the types involved, but on the context in which the conversion happened. CVL 2 simplifies these rules and improves the clarity and predictability of casts.
In CVL 2, you can always use a subtype whenever the
supertype is accepted. For example, you can always use a uint8
where an
int16
is expected. We say that the subtype can be “implicitly cast” to the
supertype.
In order to convert from a supertype to a subtype, you must use an explicit
cast. In CVL 1, only a few casting operators (such as to_uint256
) were
supported.
CVL 2 replaces these casting operators with two new casting operators: assert casts
such as assert_uint8(x)
or assert_int256(x)
, and require casts such as require_uint8(x)
or require_int256(x)
.
Each of these casts checks that the value is in range; the assert
cast will
report a counterexample if the value is out of range, while the require
cast
will ignore counterexamples where the cast value is out of range.
Warning
As with normal require
statements, require casts can cause vacuity and should
be used with care.
CVL 2 supports assert and require casts on all numeric types.
Casts from address
or bytes1
…bytes32
to integer types are not
supported (see Support for bytes1…bytes32 regarding casting in the other direction, and Casting enums to integer types for information on casting
enums).
require
and assert
casts are not allowed anywhere inside of a
quantified statement. You can work around this limitation
by adding a second variable. For example, the following axiom is invalid
because x+1
is not a uint
:
ghost mapping(uint => uint) a {
axiom forall uint x . a[x+1] == 0
}
However, it can be replaced with the following:
ghost mapping(uint => uint) a {
axiom forall uint x . forall uint y . (to_mathint(y) == x + 1) => a[y] == 0
}
Casting enums to integer types
In CVL2 enums are not directly comparable to the corresponding integer type (uint8
). Instead one must use one of the new cast
operators. For example
uint8 x = MyContract.MyEnum.VAL; // will fail typechecking
uint8 x = assert_uint8(MyContract.MyEnum.VAL); // good
mathint x = to_mathint(MyContract.MyEnum.VAL); // good
Casting integer types to an enum is not supported.
Casting addresses to bytes32
CVL2 supports casting from the address
type to the bytes32
type. For
example:
address a = 0xa44f5d3d624DfD660ecc11FF777587AD0a19606d;
bytes32 b = to_bytes32(a);
The cast from address
to bytes32
behaves equivalently to the Solidity
code:
address a = 0xa44f5d3d624DfD660ecc11FF777587AD0a19606d;
bytes32 b = bytes32(uint256(uint160(a)));
Among other things, this behavior means that the resulting bytes32
value is right-aligned and zero-padded to the left.
CVL2 also supports casting from the bytes32
type to the address
type
using either the require_address()
or assert_address()
cast functions.
bytes32 b = to_bytes32(0xa44f5d3d624DfD660ecc11FF777587AD0a19606d);
address a = assert_address(b);
Note that require_address()
will silently allow a cast to continue
when the bytes32
variable contains a value that lies in the range
2^160 < var < 2^256
. The assert_address()
cast function will fail
when the bytes32
variable contains a value in that same range.
bytes32 b = to_bytes32(0xa44f5d3d624DfD660ecc11FF777587AD0a19606d0e); // Note this contains one extra byte
address a = require_address(b); // Silently does the cast.
While when using assert_address
:
bytes32 b = to_bytes32(0xa44f5d3d624DfD660ecc11FF777587AD0a19606d0e); // Note this contains one extra byte
address a = assert_address(b); // This will fail.
Casting from bytes32
to address
behaves equivalently to the Solidity
code:
bytes32 b = bytes32(0xa44f5d3d624DfD660ecc11FF777587AD0a19606d);
address a = address(uint160(uint256(b)));
Modulo operator %
returns negative values for negative inputs
As in Solidity, if n < 0
then n % k == -(-n % k)
.
Support for bytes1
…bytes32
CVL 2 supports the types bytes1
, bytes2
, …, bytes32
, as in Solidity.
Number literals must be explicitly cast to these types using to_bytesN
; for
example:
bytes32 x = to_bytes32(0);
Unlike Solidity, bytes1
…bytes32
literals do not need to be written in hex
or padded to the correct length.
The only conversion between integer types and these types is from uint<i*8>
to
bytes<i>
(i.e. unsigned integers with the same bitwidth as the target bytes<i>
type);
For example:
uint24 u;
bytes3 x = to_bytes3(u); // This is OK
bytes4 y = to_bytes4(u); // This will fail
Changes for bitwise operations
In CVL1, the exact details for bitwise operations (such as &
, |
, and <<
) were not
completely specified, especially for negative integers.
In CVL 2, all bitwise operations (&
, |
, ~
, >>
, >>>
, <<
, and xor
)
on integer types first convert to a 256 bit word, then perform the operations
on the full 256-bit word, then convert back to the expected type. Signed
integer types use twos-complement encoding.
The two right-shifts differ in how they treat signed integers. >>
is an
arithmetic shift; it preserves the sign bit. >>>
is a logical shift; it pads
the shifted word with zero.
Bitwise operations cannot be performed on mathint
values.
Note
By default, bitwise operators are overapproximated (in both CVL 1 and CVL 2), so you may see counterexamples that incorrectly compute the results of bitwise operations. The approximations are still sound: the Prover will not report a rule as verified if the original code does not satisfy the rule.
The --precise_bitwise_ops flag makes the Prover’s reasoning about bitwise operations more precise, but this flag is experimental in CVL 2.
Changes to the fallback function
In CVL 1, you could determine whether a method
object was the fallback function
by comparing its selector to certorafallback().selector
:
assert f.selector == certorafallback().selector,
"f must be the fallback";
In CVL 2, certorafallback()
is no longer valid. Instead, you can use the new
field f.isFallback
to detect the fallback method:
assert f.isFallback,
"f must be the fallback";
Removed features
As we transit to CVL 2, we have removed several language features that are no longer used.
We have removed these features because we think they are no longer used and no longer useful. If you find that you do need one of these features, contact Certora support.
Methods entries for sighashes
In CVL 1, you could write a sighash instead of a method identifier in the
methods
block. This feature is no longer supported. You will need to have
the name and argument types of the called method in order to provide an entry.
invoke
, sinvoke
, and call
Older versions of CVL had special syntax for calling contract and CVL functions:
invoke f(args);
should be replaced withf@withrevert(args);
.sinvoke f(args);
should be replaced withf(args);
.call f(args)
should be replaced withf(args)
.
static_assert
and static_require
These deprecated aliases for assert
and require
are being removed; replace
them with assert
and require
respectively.
invoke_fallback
and certorafallback()
The invoke_fallback
syntax is no longer supported; there is no longer a way
to directly invoke the fallback method. You can work around this limitation by
writing a parametric rule and filtering on f.isFallback
. See
Changes to the fallback function.
invoke_whole
The invoke_whole
keyword is no longer supported.
Havocing local variables
In CVL 1, you could write the following:
calldataarg args; env e;
f(e, args);
havoc args;
g(e, args);
In CVL 2, you can only havoc
ghost variables and ghost functions. Instead of
havocing a local variable, replace the havoced variable with a new variable. For
example, you should replace the above with
calldataarg args; env e;
f(e,args);
calldataarg args2;
g(e,args2);
Destructuring syntax for struct returns
In CVL 1, if a contract function returned a struct, you could use a destructuring syntax to get the return value in your spec. For example, consider the following contract:
contract Example {
struct S {
uint firstField;
uint secondField;
bool thirdField;
}
function f() returns(S) { ... }
function g() returns(uint, uint) { ... }
}
To access the return value of f
in CVL 1, you could write the following:
uint x; uint y; bool z;
x, y, z = f();
This syntax is no longer supported. Instead, you should declare a variable with the struct type:
Example.S result = f();
uint x = result.firstField;
Destructuring assignments are still allowed for functions that return multiple values; the following is valid:
uint x; uint y;
x, y = g();
bytes[]
and string[]
In CVL 1, you could declare variables of type string[]
and bytes[]
. You can
no longer use these types in CVL.
You can still declare contract methods that use these types in the methods
block. However, you can only call methods that take one of these types as an
argument by passing a calldataarg
variable, and you cannot access the return
value of a method that returns one of these types.
pragma
CVL 1 had a pragma
command for specifying the CVL version, but this feature
was not used and has been removed in CVL 2.
events
CVL 1 had syntax for an events
block, but it did nothing and has been removed.
Changes to the Command Line Interface (CLI)
As part of the transition to CVL 2 changes were made to enhanced clarity, uniformity, and readability on the Command-Line Interface (CLI). The complete CLI specification can be found here
Note
The changes will take effect starting v4.3.1 of certora-cli
.
Note
To opt-out of the new CLI, one can set an environment variable CERTORA_OLD_API
to 1
, e.g.:
export CERTORA_OLD_API=1
.
The old CLI will not be available in versions released after August 31st, 2023
Flags Renaming
In CVL 2 some flags were renamed:
flags with names that are generic or wrong
flags that do not match their corresponding key in the
conf
fileflags that do not follow the snake case format
This is the list of the flags that were renamed:
CVL 1 |
CVL 2 |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prover Args
Prover args
are CLI flags that are sent to the Prover. Prover args
can be set in one of two ways:
Using specific CLI flags (e.g.
--loop_iter
)As parameters to the
--prover_args
(--settings
in CVL 1)
Unlike CVL 1, if a prover arg
is set using a specific CLI flag it cannot be set
using --prover_args
. In addition, the value commas and equal signs separators that were used in --settings
were replaced with white-spaces
in --prover_args
.
Example:
Consider this call to certoraRun
using CVL 1 syntax
certoraRun Compound.sol \
--verify Compound:Compound.spec \
--solc solc8.13 \
--settings -smt_bitVectorTheory=true,-smt_hashingScheme=plainInjectivity,-assumeUnwindCond
In order to convert this call to CVL 2 we:
renamed
--settings
to--prover_args
replaced
-assumeUnwindCond
with the flag--optimistic_loop
removed the comma and equal sign separators
certoraRun Compound.sol \
--verify Compound:Compound.spec \
--solc solc8.13 \
--optimistic_loop \
--prover_args '-smt_bitVectorTheory true -smt_hashingScheme plainInjectivity'
Solidity Compiler Args
The Solidity Compiler Args
are CLI flags that are sent to the Solidity compiler. The behavior of the Solidity Args
is similar to Prover Args
. The flag --solc_args
can only be used if there is no CLI flag that sets the Solidity flag and the value of --solc_args
is
a string that is sent as is to the Solidity compiler.
Example:
Consider this call to certoraRun
using CVL 1 syntax
certoraRun Compound.sol \
--verify Compound:Compound.spec \
--solc solc8.13 \
--solc_args "['--optimize', '--optimize-runs', '200', '--experimental-via-ir']"
In CVL 2 calling optimize is using --solc_optimize
certoraRun Compound.sol \
--verify Compound:Compound.spec \
--solc solc8.13 \
--solc_optimize 200 \
--solc_args "--experimental-via-ir"
Enhanced server support
In CVL 1, two server platforms were supported:
staging
was set using the flag--staging [Branch/hotfix]
production
was set using the flag--cloud [Branch/hotfix]
In CVL 2 the flag --server
was added to replace --staging
--cloud
and to allow adding additional server platforms.
--server
gets as a parameter the platform name.
--prover_version
is a new flag in CVL 2 For setting the Branch/hot-fix